Compare lenses

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II vs Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III VC

The Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II and the Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III VC side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.

Which to pick

Pick the Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II if you want a wider view (from 24mm equivalent) and a lighter lens (107 g against 460 g). Pick the Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III VC if you want more reach (to 300mm equivalent).

Still torn? Ask the guide about the Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II and the Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III VC

Specs side by side

Rows that differ are in full colour; the better value is marked where one is better by any measure.
Spec	Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II	Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III VC
Maker	Sony	Tamron
Focal length	16-50mm (zoom)	18-200mm (zoom)
Full-frame equivalent	24-75mm on APS-C	27-300mm on APS-C
Maximum aperture	f/3.5-5.6	f/3.5-6.3
Made for	APS-C	APS-C
Mounts	Sony E	Sony E
Stabilised	yes	yes
Autofocus	yes	yes
Zoom range	3.1×	11.1×more range
Weight	107 glighter	460 g
Cameras it fits	41 in this guide	41 in this guide

Focal range, in full-frame terms

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II: 16-50mm on APS-C, like 24-75mm.

Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III VC: 18-200mm on APS-C, like 27-300mm.

Aperture

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II: f/3.5 wide open.

Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III VC: f/3.5 wide open.

Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.

Field of view

How wide each sees, at each end, on the sensor it was made for.

Cameras they fit

41 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body.