Compare lenses

Sigma 35mm f/2 DG Contemporary vs Zeiss Loxia 35mm f/2

The Sigma 35mm f/2 DG Contemporary and the Zeiss Loxia 35mm f/2 side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.

Which to pick

Pick the Sigma 35mm f/2 DG Contemporary if you want autofocus and a fit on more cameras (66 against 41 in this guide). On these specs the Zeiss Loxia 35mm f/2 has no clear advantage: choose it if the price, the handling or a lens you own decides it.

Still torn? Ask the guide about the Sigma 35mm f/2 DG Contemporary and the Zeiss Loxia 35mm f/2

Specs side by side

Rows that differ are in full colour; the better value is marked where one is better by any measure.
Spec	Sigma 35mm f/2 DG Contemporary	Zeiss Loxia 35mm f/2
Maker	Sigma	Zeiss
Focal length	35mm (prime)	35mm (prime)
Full-frame equivalent	35mm	35mm
Maximum aperture	f/2	f/2
Made for	Full frame	Full frame
Mounts	Sony E, L-Mount	Sony E
Stabilised	no	no
Autofocus	yesautofocus	no, manual focus
Weight	325 g	340 g
Cameras it fits	66 in this guidefits more cameras	41 in this guide

Focal range, in full-frame terms

Sigma 35mm f/2 DG Contemporary: 35mm.

Zeiss Loxia 35mm f/2: 35mm.

Aperture

Sigma 35mm f/2 DG Contemporary: f/2 wide open.

Zeiss Loxia 35mm f/2: f/2 wide open.

Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.

Field of view

How wide each sees, at each end, on the sensor it was made for.

Cameras they fit

41 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Sigma 35mm f/2 DG Contemporary fits 66 and the Zeiss Loxia 35mm f/2 41.