Compare lenses

Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art vs Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO

The Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art and the Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.

Which to pick

Pick the Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art if you want a brighter f/1.8 (0.6 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds and coverage of full frame, so it suits the larger-sensor bodies too. Pick the Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO if you want a design for APS-C, which usually means smaller and lighter.

Still torn? Ask the guide about the Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art and the Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO

Specs side by side

Rows that differ are in full colour; the better value is marked where one is better by any measure.
Spec	Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art	Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO
Maker	Sigma	Viltrox
Focal length	135mm (prime)	90mm (prime)
Full-frame equivalent	135mm	135mm on APS-C
Maximum aperture	f/1.8brighter	f/2.2
Made for	Full frame	APS-C
Mounts	Canon EF, Nikon F, Sony E, L-Mount	Sony E, Fujifilm X, Nikon Z
Stabilised	no	no
Autofocus	yes	yes
Weight	not listed	320 g
Cameras it fits	105 in this guide	88 in this guide

Focal range, in full-frame terms

Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art: 135mm.

Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO: 90mm on APS-C, like 135mm.

Aperture

Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art: f/1.8 wide open.

Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO: f/2.2 wide open.

Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.

Field of view

How wide each sees, at each end, on the sensor it was made for.

Cameras they fit

41 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art fits 105 and the Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO 88.