Compare lenses

OM System M.Zuiko 50-200mm f/2.8 IS PRO vs Panasonic Lumix G X 35-100mm f/2.8 II

The OM System M.Zuiko 50-200mm f/2.8 IS PRO and the Panasonic Lumix G X 35-100mm f/2.8 II side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.

Which to pick

Pick the OM System M.Zuiko 50-200mm f/2.8 IS PRO if you want more reach (to 400mm equivalent). Pick the Panasonic Lumix G X 35-100mm f/2.8 II if you want a wider view (from 70mm equivalent) and a lighter lens (357 g against 1075 g).

Still torn? Ask the guide about the OM System M.Zuiko 50-200mm f/2.8 IS PRO and the Panasonic Lumix G X 35-100mm f/2.8 II

Specs side by side

Rows that differ are in full colour; the better value is marked where one is better by any measure.
Spec	OM System M.Zuiko 50-200mm f/2.8 IS PRO	Panasonic Lumix G X 35-100mm f/2.8 II
Maker	OM System	Panasonic
Focal length	50-200mm (zoom)	35-100mm (zoom)
Full-frame equivalent	100-400mm on Micro Four Thirds	70-200mm on Micro Four Thirds
Maximum aperture	f/2.8	f/2.8
Made for	Micro Four Thirds	Micro Four Thirds
Mounts	Micro Four Thirds	Micro Four Thirds
Stabilised	yes	yes
Autofocus	yes	yes
Zoom range	4.0×more range	2.9×
Weight	1075 g	357 glighter
Cameras it fits	49 in this guide	49 in this guide

Focal range, in full-frame terms

OM System M.Zuiko 50-200mm f/2.8 IS PRO: 50-200mm on Micro Four Thirds, like 100-400mm.

Panasonic Lumix G X 35-100mm f/2.8 II: 35-100mm on Micro Four Thirds, like 70-200mm.

Aperture

OM System M.Zuiko 50-200mm f/2.8 IS PRO: f/2.8 wide open.

Panasonic Lumix G X 35-100mm f/2.8 II: f/2.8 wide open.

Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.

Field of view

How wide each sees, at each end, on the sensor it was made for.

Cameras they fit

49 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body.