Compare lenses

Olympus M.Zuiko 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II vs OM System M.Zuiko 150-600mm f/5-6.3 IS

The Olympus M.Zuiko 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II and the OM System M.Zuiko 150-600mm f/5-6.3 IS side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.

Which to pick

Pick the Olympus M.Zuiko 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II if you want a wider view (from 150mm equivalent) and a lighter lens (423 g against 2065 g). Pick the OM System M.Zuiko 150-600mm f/5-6.3 IS if you want optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it and more reach (to 1200mm equivalent).

Still torn? Ask the guide about the Olympus M.Zuiko 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II and the OM System M.Zuiko 150-600mm f/5-6.3 IS

Specs side by side

Rows that differ are in full colour; the better value is marked where one is better by any measure.
Spec	Olympus M.Zuiko 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II	OM System M.Zuiko 150-600mm f/5-6.3 IS
Maker	Olympus	OM System
Focal length	75-300mm (zoom)	150-600mm (zoom)
Full-frame equivalent	150-600mm on Micro Four Thirds	300-1200mm on Micro Four Thirds
Maximum aperture	f/4.8-6.7	f/5-6.3
Made for	Micro Four Thirds	Micro Four Thirds
Mounts	Micro Four Thirds	Micro Four Thirds
Stabilised	no	yesstabilised
Autofocus	yes	yes
Zoom range	4.0×	4.0×
Weight	423 glighter	2065 g
Cameras it fits	49 in this guide	49 in this guide

Focal range, in full-frame terms

Olympus M.Zuiko 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II: 75-300mm on Micro Four Thirds, like 150-600mm.

OM System M.Zuiko 150-600mm f/5-6.3 IS: 150-600mm on Micro Four Thirds, like 300-1200mm.

Aperture

Olympus M.Zuiko 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II: f/4.8 wide open.

OM System M.Zuiko 150-600mm f/5-6.3 IS: f/5 wide open.

Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.

Field of view

How wide each sees, at each end, on the sensor it was made for.

Cameras they fit

49 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body.