Compare lenses

Olympus M.Zuiko 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3 vs Olympus M.Zuiko 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 EZ

The Olympus M.Zuiko 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3 and the Olympus M.Zuiko 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 EZ side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.

Which to pick

Pick the Olympus M.Zuiko 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3 if you want more reach (to 400mm equivalent). Pick the Olympus M.Zuiko 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 EZ if you want a lighter lens (211 g against 455 g).

Still torn? Ask the guide about the Olympus M.Zuiko 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3 and the Olympus M.Zuiko 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 EZ

Specs side by side

Rows that differ are in full colour; the better value is marked where one is better by any measure.
Spec	Olympus M.Zuiko 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3	Olympus M.Zuiko 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 EZ
Maker	Olympus	Olympus
Focal length	12-200mm (zoom)	12-50mm (zoom)
Full-frame equivalent	24-400mm on Micro Four Thirds	24-100mm on Micro Four Thirds
Maximum aperture	f/3.5-6.3	f/3.5-6.3
Made for	Micro Four Thirds	Micro Four Thirds
Mounts	Micro Four Thirds	Micro Four Thirds
Stabilised	no	no
Autofocus	yes	yes
Zoom range	16.7×more range	4.2×
Weight	455 g	211 glighter
Cameras it fits	49 in this guide	49 in this guide

Focal range, in full-frame terms

Olympus M.Zuiko 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3: 12-200mm on Micro Four Thirds, like 24-400mm.

Olympus M.Zuiko 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 EZ: 12-50mm on Micro Four Thirds, like 24-100mm.

Aperture

Olympus M.Zuiko 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3: f/3.5 wide open.

Olympus M.Zuiko 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 EZ: f/3.5 wide open.

Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.

Field of view

How wide each sees, at each end, on the sensor it was made for.

Cameras they fit

49 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body.