Compare lenses
Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR vs Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
The Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR and the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR if you want a lighter lens (330 g against 525 g). Pick the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD if you want more reach (to 105mm equivalent) and a fit on more cameras (106 against 16 in this guide).
Specs side by side
| Spec | Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR | Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Nikon | Tamron |
| Focal length | 16-50mm (zoom) | 17-70mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 24-75mm on APS-C | 26-105mm on APS-C |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Made for | APS-C | APS-C |
| Mounts | Nikon Z | Sony E, Fujifilm X, Nikon Z, Canon RF |
| Stabilised | yes | yes |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 3.1× | 4.1×more range |
| Weight | 330 glighter | 525 g |
| Cameras it fits | 16 in this guide | 106 in this guidefits more cameras |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
16 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR fits 16 and the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 106.