Compare lenses
Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR vs Tamron 16-50mm f/2.8 A
The Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR and the Tamron 16-50mm f/2.8 A side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR if you want optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it. Pick the Tamron 16-50mm f/2.8 A if you want a fit on more cameras (106 against 16 in this guide).
Still torn? Ask the guide about the Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR and the Tamron 16-50mm f/2.8 A
Specs side by side
| Spec | Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR | Tamron 16-50mm f/2.8 A |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Nikon | Tamron |
| Focal length | 16-50mm (zoom) | 16-50mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 24-75mm on APS-C | 24-75mm on APS-C |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Made for | APS-C | APS-C |
| Mounts | Nikon Z | Sony E, Nikon Z, Fujifilm X, Canon RF |
| Stabilised | yesstabilised | no |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 3.1× | 3.1× |
| Weight | 330 g | not listed |
| Cameras it fits | 16 in this guide | 106 in this guidefits more cameras |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
16 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR fits 16 and the Tamron 16-50mm f/2.8 A 106.