Compare lenses
Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S vs Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S II
The Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S and the Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S II side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S II if you want a lighter lens (1180 g against 1440 g). On these specs the Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S has no clear advantage: choose it if the price, the handling or a lens you own decides it.
Specs side by side
| Spec | Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S | Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S II |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Nikon | Nikon |
| Focal length | 70-200mm (zoom) | 70-200mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 70-200mm | 70-200mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Mounts | Nikon Z | Nikon Z |
| Stabilised | yes | yes |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 2.9× | 2.9× |
| Weight | 1440 g | 1180 glighter |
| Cameras it fits | 16 in this guide | 16 in this guide |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
16 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body.