Compare lenses
Nikon Z 40mm f/2 vs TTArtisan AF 27mm f/2.8
The Nikon Z 40mm f/2 and the TTArtisan AF 27mm f/2.8 side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Nikon Z 40mm f/2 if you want a brighter f/2 (1.0 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds and coverage of full frame, so it suits the larger-sensor bodies too. Pick the TTArtisan AF 27mm f/2.8 if you want a design for APS-C, which usually means smaller and lighter; a fit on more cameras (88 against 16 in this guide); and a lighter lens (94 g against 170 g).
Still torn? Ask the guide about the Nikon Z 40mm f/2 and the TTArtisan AF 27mm f/2.8
Specs side by side
| Spec | Nikon Z 40mm f/2 | TTArtisan AF 27mm f/2.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Nikon | TTArtisan |
| Focal length | 40mm (prime) | 27mm (prime) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 40mm | 40mm on APS-C |
| Maximum aperture | f/2brighter | f/2.8 |
| Made for | Full frame | APS-C |
| Mounts | Nikon Z | Sony E, Fujifilm X, Nikon Z |
| Stabilised | no | no |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Weight | 170 g | 94 glighter |
| Cameras it fits | 16 in this guide | 88 in this guidefits more cameras |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
16 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Nikon Z 40mm f/2 fits 16 and the TTArtisan AF 27mm f/2.8 88.