Compare lenses
Nikon Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR vs Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD
The Nikon Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR and the Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Nikon Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR if you want a brighter f/4 (0.3 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds; optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it; more reach (to 400mm equivalent); and a wider view (from 28mm equivalent). Pick the Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD if you want a fit on more cameras (57 against 16 in this guide) and a lighter lens (545 g against 725 g).
Specs side by side
| Spec | Nikon Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR | Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Nikon | Tamron |
| Focal length | 28-400mm (zoom) | 70-300mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 28-400mm | 70-300mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/4-8brighter | f/4.5-6.3 |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Mounts | Nikon Z | Sony E, Nikon Z |
| Stabilised | yesstabilised | no |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 14.3×more range | 4.3× |
| Weight | 725 g | 545 glighter |
| Cameras it fits | 16 in this guide | 57 in this guidefits more cameras |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
16 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Nikon Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR fits 16 and the Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD 57.