Compare lenses
Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II vs Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR
The Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II and the Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II if you want coverage of full frame, so it suits the larger-sensor bodies too. Pick the Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR if you want optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it; a design for APS-C, which usually means smaller and lighter; and a lighter lens (330 g against 675 g).
Still torn? Ask the guide about the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II and the Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR
Specs side by side
| Spec | Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II | Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Nikon | Nikon |
| Focal length | 24-70mm (zoom) | 16-50mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 24-70mm | 24-75mm on APS-C |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Made for | Full frame | APS-C |
| Mounts | Nikon Z | Nikon Z |
| Stabilised | no | yesstabilised |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 2.9× | 3.1× |
| Weight | 675 g | 330 glighter |
| Cameras it fits | 16 in this guide | 16 in this guide |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
16 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body.