Compare lenses
Nikon Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR vs Nikon Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR
The Nikon Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR and the Nikon Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Nikon Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR if you want a wider view (from 24mm equivalent) and a lighter lens (570 g against 725 g). Pick the Nikon Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR if you want more reach (to 400mm equivalent).
Still torn? Ask the guide about the Nikon Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR and the Nikon Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR
Specs side by side
| Spec | Nikon Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR | Nikon Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Nikon | Nikon |
| Focal length | 24-200mm (zoom) | 28-400mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 24-200mm | 28-400mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/4-6.3 | f/4-8 |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Mounts | Nikon Z | Nikon Z |
| Stabilised | yes | yes |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 8.3× | 14.3×more range |
| Weight | 570 glighter | 725 g |
| Cameras it fits | 16 in this guide | 16 in this guide |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
16 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body.