Compare lenses

Nikon AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR vs Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di VC PZD

The Nikon AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR and the Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di VC PZD side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.

Which to pick

Pick the Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di VC PZD if you want a fit on more cameras (39 against 17 in this guide). On these specs the Nikon AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR has no clear advantage: choose it if the price, the handling or a lens you own decides it.

Still torn? Ask the guide about the Nikon AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR and the Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di VC PZD

Specs side by side

Rows that differ are in full colour; the better value is marked where one is better by any measure.
Spec	Nikon AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR	Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di VC PZD
Maker	Nikon	Tamron
Focal length	28-300mm (zoom)	28-300mm (zoom)
Full-frame equivalent	28-300mm	28-300mm
Maximum aperture	f/3.5-5.6	f/3.5-6.3
Made for	Full frame	Full frame
Mounts	Nikon F	Canon EF, Nikon F
Stabilised	yes	yes
Autofocus	yes	yes
Zoom range	10.7×	10.7×
Cameras it fits	17 in this guide	39 in this guidefits more cameras

Focal range, in full-frame terms

Nikon AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR: 28-300mm.

Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di VC PZD: 28-300mm.

Aperture

Nikon AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR: f/3.5 wide open.

Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di VC PZD: f/3.5 wide open.

Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.

Field of view

How wide each sees, at each end, on the sensor it was made for.

Cameras they fit

17 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Nikon AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR fits 17 and the Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di VC PZD 39.