Compare lenses
Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D vs Viltrox AF 14mm f/4 Air
The Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D and the Viltrox AF 14mm f/4 Air side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D if you want a fit on more cameras (120 against 82 in this guide). Pick the Viltrox AF 14mm f/4 Air if you want autofocus and a lighter lens (170 g against 228 g).
Still torn? Ask the guide about the Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D and the Viltrox AF 14mm f/4 Air
Specs side by side
| Spec | Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D | Viltrox AF 14mm f/4 Air |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Laowa | Viltrox |
| Focal length | 14mm (prime) | 14mm (prime) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 14mm | 14mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/4 | f/4 |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Mounts | Sony E, Nikon Z, Canon RF, L-Mount, Leica M | Sony E, Nikon Z, L-Mount |
| Stabilised | no | no |
| Autofocus | no, manual focus | yesautofocus |
| Weight | 228 g | 170 glighter |
| Cameras it fits | 120 in this guidefits more cameras | 82 in this guide |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
82 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D fits 120 and the Viltrox AF 14mm f/4 Air 82.
Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D
- Sony FX5
- Sony a7R VI
- Canon EOS R6 V
- Canon EOS R8 Mark II
- Nikon Z5 IIC
- Leica SL3-P
- Sony FX2
- Sony a7 V
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Canon EOS R50 V