Compare lenses
Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D vs TTArtisan Tilt-Shift 17mm f/4 ASPH
The Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D and the TTArtisan Tilt-Shift 17mm f/4 ASPH side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D if you want a design for Full frame, which usually means smaller and lighter. Pick the TTArtisan Tilt-Shift 17mm f/4 ASPH if you want coverage of medium format, so it suits the larger-sensor bodies too.
Specs side by side
| Spec | Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D | TTArtisan Tilt-Shift 17mm f/4 ASPH |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Laowa | TTArtisan |
| Focal length | 14mm (prime) | 17mm (prime) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 14mm | 13mm on Medium format (44 x 33) |
| Maximum aperture | f/4 | f/4 |
| Made for | Full frame | Medium format (44 x 33) |
| Mounts | Sony E, Nikon Z, Canon RF, L-Mount, Leica M | Sony E, Nikon Z, Canon RF, L-Mount, Fujifilm G |
| Stabilised | no | no |
| Autofocus | no, manual focus | no, manual focus |
| Weight | 228 g | not listed |
| Cameras it fits | 120 in this guide | 108 in this guide |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
100 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D fits 120 and the TTArtisan Tilt-Shift 17mm f/4 ASPH 108.
Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D
- Sony FX5
- Sony a7R VI
- Canon EOS R6 V
- Canon EOS R8 Mark II
- Nikon Z5 IIC
- Leica SL3-P
- Sony FX2
- Sony a7 V
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Canon EOS R50 V