Compare lenses
Laowa 100mm f/2.8 2X Ultra Macro APO vs Zeiss Milvus 100mm f/2 Macro
The Laowa 100mm f/2.8 2X Ultra Macro APO and the Zeiss Milvus 100mm f/2 Macro side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Laowa 100mm f/2.8 2X Ultra Macro APO if you want a fit on more cameras (139 against 39 in this guide). Pick the Zeiss Milvus 100mm f/2 Macro if you want a brighter f/2 (1.0 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds.
Specs side by side
| Spec | Laowa 100mm f/2.8 2X Ultra Macro APO | Zeiss Milvus 100mm f/2 Macro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Laowa | Zeiss |
| Focal length | 100mm (macro) | 100mm (macro) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 100mm | 100mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2brighter |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Mounts | Sony E, Nikon Z, Canon RF, L-Mount, Canon EF, Nikon F | Canon EF, Nikon F |
| Stabilised | no | no |
| Autofocus | no, manual focus | no, manual focus |
| Weight | 638 g | not listed |
| Cameras it fits | 139 in this guidefits more cameras | 39 in this guide |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
39 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Laowa 100mm f/2.8 2X Ultra Macro APO fits 139 and the Zeiss Milvus 100mm f/2 Macro 39.
Laowa 100mm f/2.8 2X Ultra Macro APO
- Sony FX5
- Sony a7R VI
- Canon EOS R6 V
- Canon EOS R8 Mark II
- Nikon Z5 IIC
- Leica SL3-P
- Sony FX2
- Sony a7 V
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Canon EOS R50 V