Compare lenses

Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR vs Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO

The Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR and the Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.

Which to pick

Pick the Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO if you want a fit on more cameras (88 against 31 in this guide) and a lighter lens (320 g against 540 g). On these specs the Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR has no clear advantage: choose it if the price, the handling or a lens you own decides it.

Still torn? Ask the guide about the Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR and the Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO

Specs side by side

Rows that differ are in full colour; the better value is marked where one is better by any measure.
Spec	Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR	Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO
Maker	Fujifilm	Viltrox
Focal length	90mm (prime)	90mm (prime)
Full-frame equivalent	135mm on APS-C	135mm on APS-C
Maximum aperture	f/2	f/2.2
Made for	APS-C	APS-C
Mounts	Fujifilm X	Sony E, Fujifilm X, Nikon Z
Stabilised	no	no
Autofocus	yes	yes
Weight	540 g	320 glighter
Cameras it fits	31 in this guide	88 in this guidefits more cameras

Focal range, in full-frame terms

Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR: 90mm on APS-C, like 135mm.

Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO: 90mm on APS-C, like 135mm.

Aperture

Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR: f/2 wide open.

Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO: f/2.2 wide open.

Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.

Field of view

How wide each sees, at each end, on the sensor it was made for.

Cameras they fit

31 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR fits 31 and the Viltrox AF 90mm f/2.2 EVO 88.