Compare lenses
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR vs Voigtländer Macro APO-Ultron 35mm f/2
The Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR and the Voigtländer Macro APO-Ultron 35mm f/2 side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR if you want autofocus and a lighter lens (170 g against 265 g). Pick the Voigtländer Macro APO-Ultron 35mm f/2 if you want a fit on more cameras (47 against 31 in this guide).
Specs side by side
| Spec | Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR | Voigtländer Macro APO-Ultron 35mm f/2 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Fujifilm | Voigtländer |
| Focal length | 35mm (prime) | 35mm (macro) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 52mm on APS-C | 52mm on APS-C |
| Maximum aperture | f/2 | f/2 |
| Made for | APS-C | APS-C |
| Mounts | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X, Nikon Z |
| Stabilised | no | no |
| Autofocus | yesautofocus | no, manual focus |
| Weight | 170 glighter | 265 g |
| Cameras it fits | 31 in this guide | 47 in this guidefits more cameras |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
31 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR fits 31 and the Voigtländer Macro APO-Ultron 35mm f/2 47.
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR
- Fujifilm X-E5
- Fujifilm X-T30 III
- Fujifilm X-M5
- Fujifilm X-T50
- Fujifilm X-S20
- Fujifilm X-H2
- Fujifilm X-H2S
- Fujifilm X-T5
- Fujifilm X-E4
- Fujifilm X-T30 II