Compare lenses

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR II vs Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

The Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR II and the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.

Which to pick

Pick the Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR II if you want a lighter lens (410 g against 525 g). Pick the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD if you want optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it; more reach (to 105mm equivalent); and a fit on more cameras (106 against 31 in this guide).

Still torn? Ask the guide about the Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR II and the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Specs side by side

Rows that differ are in full colour; the better value is marked where one is better by any measure.
Spec	Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR II	Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Maker	Fujifilm	Tamron
Focal length	16-55mm (zoom)	17-70mm (zoom)
Full-frame equivalent	24-82mm on APS-C	26-105mm on APS-C
Maximum aperture	f/2.8	f/2.8
Made for	APS-C	APS-C
Mounts	Fujifilm X	Sony E, Fujifilm X, Nikon Z, Canon RF
Stabilised	no	yesstabilised
Autofocus	yes	yes
Zoom range	3.4×	4.1×more range
Weight	410 glighter	525 g
Cameras it fits	31 in this guide	106 in this guidefits more cameras

Focal range, in full-frame terms

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR II: 16-55mm on APS-C, like 24-82mm.

Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD: 17-70mm on APS-C, like 26-105mm.

Aperture

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR II: f/2.8 wide open.

Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD: f/2.8 wide open.

Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.

Field of view

How wide each sees, at each end, on the sensor it was made for.

Cameras they fit

31 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR II fits 31 and the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 106.