Compare lenses

Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR vs Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 Di III-A RXD

The Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR and the Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 Di III-A RXD side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.

Which to pick

Pick the Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR if you want optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it and more reach (to 36mm equivalent). Pick the Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 Di III-A RXD if you want a brighter f/2.8 (1.0 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds; a fit on more cameras (90 against 31 in this guide); and a lighter lens (335 g against 385 g).

Still torn? Ask the guide about the Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR and the Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 Di III-A RXD

Specs side by side

Rows that differ are in full colour; the better value is marked where one is better by any measure.
Spec	Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR	Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 Di III-A RXD
Maker	Fujifilm	Tamron
Focal length	10-24mm (zoom)	11-20mm (zoom)
Full-frame equivalent	15-36mm on APS-C	16-30mm on APS-C
Maximum aperture	f/4	f/2.8brighter
Made for	APS-C	APS-C
Mounts	Fujifilm X	Sony E, Fujifilm X, Canon RF
Stabilised	yesstabilised	no
Autofocus	yes	yes
Zoom range	2.4×more range	1.8×
Weight	385 g	335 glighter
Cameras it fits	31 in this guide	90 in this guidefits more cameras

Focal range, in full-frame terms

Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR: 10-24mm on APS-C, like 15-36mm.

Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 Di III-A RXD: 11-20mm on APS-C, like 16-30mm.

Aperture

Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR: f/4 wide open.

Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 Di III-A RXD: f/2.8 wide open.

Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.

Field of view

How wide each sees, at each end, on the sensor it was made for.

Cameras they fit

31 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR fits 31 and the Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 Di III-A RXD 90.