Compare lenses

Fujifilm XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS II vs Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR

The Fujifilm XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS II and the Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.

Which to pick

Pick the Fujifilm XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS II if you want optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it and a lighter lens (195 g against 240 g). Pick the Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR if you want a brighter f/2.8 (0.6 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds.

Still torn? Ask the guide about the Fujifilm XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS II and the Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR

Specs side by side

Rows that differ are in full colour; the better value is marked where one is better by any measure.
Spec	Fujifilm XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS II	Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR
Maker	Fujifilm	Fujifilm
Focal length	16-50mm (zoom)	16-50mm (zoom)
Full-frame equivalent	24-75mm on APS-C	24-75mm on APS-C
Maximum aperture	f/3.5-5.6	f/2.8-4.8brighter
Made for	APS-C	APS-C
Mounts	Fujifilm X	Fujifilm X
Stabilised	yesstabilised	no
Autofocus	yes	yes
Zoom range	3.1×	3.1×
Weight	195 glighter	240 g
Cameras it fits	31 in this guide	31 in this guide

Focal range, in full-frame terms

Fujifilm XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS II: 16-50mm on APS-C, like 24-75mm.

Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR: 16-50mm on APS-C, like 24-75mm.

Aperture

Fujifilm XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS II: f/3.5 wide open.

Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR: f/2.8 wide open.

Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.

Field of view

How wide each sees, at each end, on the sensor it was made for.

Cameras they fit

31 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body.