Compare lenses

Fujifilm MKX 50-135mm T2.9 vs Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

The Fujifilm MKX 50-135mm T2.9 and the Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.

Which to pick

Pick the Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR if you want optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it and autofocus. On these specs the Fujifilm MKX 50-135mm T2.9 has no clear advantage: choose it if the price, the handling or a lens you own decides it.

Still torn? Ask the guide about the Fujifilm MKX 50-135mm T2.9 and the Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Specs side by side

Rows that differ are in full colour; the better value is marked where one is better by any measure.
Spec	Fujifilm MKX 50-135mm T2.9	Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR
Maker	Fujifilm	Fujifilm
Focal length	50-135mm (zoom)	50-140mm (zoom)
Full-frame equivalent	75-202mm on APS-C	75-210mm on APS-C
Maximum aperture	f/2.9	f/2.8
Made for	APS-C	APS-C
Mounts	Fujifilm X	Fujifilm X
Stabilised	no	yesstabilised
Autofocus	no, manual focus	yesautofocus
Zoom range	2.7×	2.8×
Weight	1100 g	995 glighter
Cameras it fits	31 in this guide	31 in this guide

Focal range, in full-frame terms

Fujifilm MKX 50-135mm T2.9: 50-135mm on APS-C, like 75-202mm.

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR: 50-140mm on APS-C, like 75-210mm.

Aperture

Fujifilm MKX 50-135mm T2.9: f/2.9 wide open.

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR: f/2.8 wide open.

Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.

Field of view

How wide each sees, at each end, on the sensor it was made for.

Cameras they fit

31 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body.