Compare lenses
Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L vs Zeiss Milvus 18mm f/2.8
The Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L and the Zeiss Milvus 18mm f/2.8 side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Zeiss Milvus 18mm f/2.8 if you want a brighter f/2.8 (1.0 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds and a fit on more cameras (39 against 22 in this guide). On these specs the Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L has no clear advantage: choose it if the price, the handling or a lens you own decides it.
Still torn? Ask the guide about the Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L and the Zeiss Milvus 18mm f/2.8
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L | Zeiss Milvus 18mm f/2.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Zeiss |
| Focal length | 17mm (prime) | 18mm (prime) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 17mm | 18mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/4 | f/2.8brighter |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Mounts | Canon EF | Canon EF, Nikon F |
| Stabilised | no | no |
| Autofocus | no, manual focus | no, manual focus |
| Cameras it fits | 22 in this guide | 39 in this guidefits more cameras |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
22 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L fits 22 and the Zeiss Milvus 18mm f/2.8 39.
Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L
- Canon EOS-1D X Mark III
- Canon EOS 850D
- Canon EOS 250D
- Canon EOS 90D
- Canon EOS 2000D
- Canon EOS 4000D
- Canon EOS 6D Mark II
- Canon EOS 200D
- Canon EOS 77D
- Canon EOS 800D