Compare lenses
Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 vs Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM
The Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 and the Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 if you want a brighter f/4 (0.6 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds; a wider view (from 75mm equivalent); and coverage of full frame, so it suits the larger-sensor bodies too. Pick the Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM if you want optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it; a design for APS-C, which usually means smaller and lighter; and a lighter lens (270 g against 507 g).
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 | Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Canon |
| Focal length | 75-300mm (zoom) | 55-210mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 75-300mm | 82-315mm on APS-C |
| Maximum aperture | f/4-5.6brighter | f/5-7.1 |
| Made for | Full frame | APS-C |
| Mounts | Canon RF | Canon RF |
| Stabilised | no | yesstabilised |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 4.0× | 3.8× |
| Weight | 507 g | 270 glighter |
| Cameras it fits | 18 in this guide | 18 in this guide |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
18 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body.
Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6
- Canon EOS R6 V
- Canon EOS R8 Mark II
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Canon EOS R50 V
- Canon EOS R1
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II
- Canon EOS R8
- Canon EOS R100
- Canon EOS R50
- Canon EOS R5 C