Compare lenses
Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM vs Sigma 50-120mm f/2.8 DC OS Contemporary
The Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM and the Sigma 50-120mm f/2.8 DC OS Contemporary side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM if you want coverage of full frame, so it suits the larger-sensor bodies too. Pick the Sigma 50-120mm f/2.8 DC OS Contemporary if you want a design for APS-C, which usually means smaller and lighter; a fit on more cameras (90 against 18 in this guide); and a lighter lens (390 g against 1070 g).
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM | Sigma 50-120mm f/2.8 DC OS Contemporary |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Sigma |
| Focal length | 70-200mm (zoom) | 50-120mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 70-200mm | 75-180mm on APS-C |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Made for | Full frame | APS-C |
| Mounts | Canon RF | Sony E, Fujifilm X, Canon RF |
| Stabilised | yes | yes |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 2.9×more range | 2.4× |
| Weight | 1070 g | 390 glighter |
| Cameras it fits | 18 in this guide | 90 in this guidefits more cameras |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
18 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM fits 18 and the Sigma 50-120mm f/2.8 DC OS Contemporary 90.
Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
- Canon EOS R6 V
- Canon EOS R8 Mark II
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Canon EOS R50 V
- Canon EOS R1
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II
- Canon EOS R8
- Canon EOS R100
- Canon EOS R50
- Canon EOS R5 C