Compare lenses
Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM vs Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM and the Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM if you want coverage of full frame, so it suits the larger-sensor bodies too and a lighter lens (395 g against 615 g). Pick the Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary if you want a brighter f/3.5 (0.4 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds; more reach (to 450mm equivalent); a design for APS-C, which usually means smaller and lighter; and a fit on more cameras (131 against 18 in this guide).
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM | Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Sigma |
| Focal length | 24-105mm (zoom) | 16-300mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 24-105mm | 24-450mm on APS-C |
| Maximum aperture | f/4-7.1 | f/3.5-6.7brighter |
| Made for | Full frame | APS-C |
| Mounts | Canon RF | Sony E, Fujifilm X, L-Mount, Canon RF, Nikon Z |
| Stabilised | yes | yes |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 4.4× | 18.8×more range |
| Weight | 395 glighter | 615 g |
| Cameras it fits | 18 in this guide | 131 in this guidefits more cameras |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
18 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM fits 18 and the Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary 131.
Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
- Canon EOS R6 V
- Canon EOS R8 Mark II
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Canon EOS R50 V
- Canon EOS R1
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II
- Canon EOS R8
- Canon EOS R100
- Canon EOS R50
- Canon EOS R5 C