Compare lenses
Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ vs Tamron 16-50mm f/2.8 A
The Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ and the Tamron 16-50mm f/2.8 A side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ if you want optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it; a wider view (from 20mm equivalent); and coverage of full frame, so it suits the larger-sensor bodies too. Pick the Tamron 16-50mm f/2.8 A if you want a brighter f/2.8 (1.0 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds; more reach (to 75mm equivalent); a design for APS-C, which usually means smaller and lighter; and a fit on more cameras (106 against 18 in this guide).
Still torn? Ask the guide about the Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ and the Tamron 16-50mm f/2.8 A
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ | Tamron 16-50mm f/2.8 A |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Tamron |
| Focal length | 20-50mm (zoom) | 16-50mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 20-50mm | 24-75mm on APS-C |
| Maximum aperture | f/4 | f/2.8brighter |
| Made for | Full frame | APS-C |
| Mounts | Canon RF | Sony E, Nikon Z, Fujifilm X, Canon RF |
| Stabilised | yesstabilised | no |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 2.5× | 3.1×more range |
| Weight | 420 g | not listed |
| Cameras it fits | 18 in this guide | 106 in this guidefits more cameras |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
18 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ fits 18 and the Tamron 16-50mm f/2.8 A 106.
Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ
- Canon EOS R6 V
- Canon EOS R8 Mark II
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Canon EOS R50 V
- Canon EOS R1
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II
- Canon EOS R8
- Canon EOS R100
- Canon EOS R50
- Canon EOS R5 C