Compare lenses
Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ vs Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM
The Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ and the Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ if you want a wider view (from 20mm equivalent) and a lighter lens (420 g against 900 g). Pick the Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM if you want a brighter f/2.8 (1.0 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds and more reach (to 70mm equivalent).
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ | Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Canon |
| Focal length | 20-50mm (zoom) | 24-70mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 20-50mm | 24-70mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/4 | f/2.8brighter |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Mounts | Canon RF | Canon RF |
| Stabilised | yes | yes |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 2.5× | 2.9×more range |
| Weight | 420 glighter | 900 g |
| Cameras it fits | 18 in this guide | 18 in this guide |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
18 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body.
Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ
- Canon EOS R6 V
- Canon EOS R8 Mark II
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Canon EOS R50 V
- Canon EOS R1
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II
- Canon EOS R8
- Canon EOS R100
- Canon EOS R50
- Canon EOS R5 C