Compare lenses
Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM vs TTArtisan 10mm f/2 ASPH
The Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM and the TTArtisan 10mm f/2 ASPH side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM if you want autofocus and coverage of full frame, so it suits the larger-sensor bodies too. Pick the TTArtisan 10mm f/2 ASPH if you want a brighter f/2 (1.0 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds; a design for APS-C, which usually means smaller and lighter; and a fit on more cameras (155 against 18 in this guide).
Still torn? Ask the guide about the Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM and the TTArtisan 10mm f/2 ASPH
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM | TTArtisan 10mm f/2 ASPH |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | TTArtisan |
| Focal length | 16mm (prime) | 10mm (prime) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 16mm | 15mm on APS-C |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2brighter |
| Made for | Full frame | APS-C |
| Mounts | Canon RF | Sony E, Fujifilm X, Nikon Z, Canon RF, Micro Four Thirds |
| Stabilised | no | no |
| Autofocus | yesautofocus | no, manual focus |
| Weight | 165 g | not listed |
| Cameras it fits | 18 in this guide | 155 in this guidefits more cameras |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
18 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM fits 18 and the TTArtisan 10mm f/2 ASPH 155.
Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM
- Canon EOS R6 V
- Canon EOS R8 Mark II
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Canon EOS R50 V
- Canon EOS R1
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II
- Canon EOS R8
- Canon EOS R100
- Canon EOS R50
- Canon EOS R5 C