Compare lenses
Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM vs Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero-D
The Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM and the Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero-D side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM if you want autofocus and a lighter lens (165 g against 500 g). Pick the Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero-D if you want a brighter f/2 (1.0 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds and a fit on more cameras (95 against 18 in this guide).
Still torn? Ask the guide about the Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM and the Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero-D
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM | Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero-D |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Laowa |
| Focal length | 16mm (prime) | 15mm (prime) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 16mm | 15mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2brighter |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Mounts | Canon RF | Sony E, Nikon Z, Canon RF, Leica M |
| Stabilised | no | no |
| Autofocus | yesautofocus | no, manual focus |
| Weight | 165 glighter | 500 g |
| Cameras it fits | 18 in this guide | 95 in this guidefits more cameras |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
18 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM fits 18 and the Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero-D 95.
Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM
- Canon EOS R6 V
- Canon EOS R8 Mark II
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Canon EOS R50 V
- Canon EOS R1
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II
- Canon EOS R8
- Canon EOS R100
- Canon EOS R50
- Canon EOS R5 C