Compare lenses
Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 IS STM vs Sigma 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN Contemporary
The Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 IS STM and the Sigma 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN Contemporary side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 IS STM if you want optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it and coverage of full frame, so it suits the larger-sensor bodies too. Pick the Sigma 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN Contemporary if you want a design for APS-C, which usually means smaller and lighter; a fit on more cameras (115 against 18 in this guide); and a lighter lens (255 g against 445 g).
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 IS STM | Sigma 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN Contemporary |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Sigma |
| Focal length | 16-28mm (zoom) | 10-18mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 16-28mm | 15-27mm on APS-C |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Made for | Full frame | APS-C |
| Mounts | Canon RF | Sony E, Fujifilm X, L-Mount, Canon RF |
| Stabilised | yesstabilised | no |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 1.8× | 1.8× |
| Weight | 445 g | 255 glighter |
| Cameras it fits | 18 in this guide | 115 in this guidefits more cameras |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
18 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 IS STM fits 18 and the Sigma 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN Contemporary 115.
Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 IS STM
- Canon EOS R6 V
- Canon EOS R8 Mark II
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Canon EOS R50 V
- Canon EOS R1
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II
- Canon EOS R8
- Canon EOS R100
- Canon EOS R50
- Canon EOS R5 C