Compare lenses
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM vs Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 Di III-A RXD
The Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM and the Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 Di III-A RXD side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM if you want optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it; more reach (to 35mm equivalent); a wider view (from 14mm equivalent); and coverage of full frame, so it suits the larger-sensor bodies too. Pick the Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 Di III-A RXD if you want a brighter f/2.8 (1.0 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds; a design for APS-C, which usually means smaller and lighter; a fit on more cameras (90 against 18 in this guide); and a lighter lens (335 g against 540 g).
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM | Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 Di III-A RXD |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Tamron |
| Focal length | 14-35mm (zoom) | 11-20mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 14-35mm | 16-30mm on APS-C |
| Maximum aperture | f/4 | f/2.8brighter |
| Made for | Full frame | APS-C |
| Mounts | Canon RF | Sony E, Fujifilm X, Canon RF |
| Stabilised | yesstabilised | no |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 2.5×more range | 1.8× |
| Weight | 540 g | 335 glighter |
| Cameras it fits | 18 in this guide | 90 in this guidefits more cameras |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
18 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM fits 18 and the Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 Di III-A RXD 90.
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM
- Canon EOS R6 V
- Canon EOS R8 Mark II
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Canon EOS R50 V
- Canon EOS R1
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II
- Canon EOS R8
- Canon EOS R100
- Canon EOS R50
- Canon EOS R5 C