Compare lenses
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM vs Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM
The Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM and the Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM if you want a lighter lens (540 g against 840 g). Pick the Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM if you want a brighter f/2.8 (1.0 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds.
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM | Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Canon |
| Focal length | 14-35mm (zoom) | 15-35mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 14-35mm | 15-35mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/4 | f/2.8brighter |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Mounts | Canon RF | Canon RF |
| Stabilised | yes | yes |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 2.5× | 2.3× |
| Weight | 540 glighter | 840 g |
| Cameras it fits | 18 in this guide | 18 in this guide |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
18 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body.
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM
- Canon EOS R6 V
- Canon EOS R8 Mark II
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Canon EOS R50 V
- Canon EOS R1
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II
- Canon EOS R8
- Canon EOS R100
- Canon EOS R50
- Canon EOS R5 C