Compare lenses
Canon RF 10-20mm f/4L IS STM vs Canon RF 7-14mm f/2.8-3.5L Fisheye STM
The Canon RF 10-20mm f/4L IS STM and the Canon RF 7-14mm f/2.8-3.5L Fisheye STM side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Canon RF 10-20mm f/4L IS STM if you want optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it and more reach (to 20mm equivalent). Pick the Canon RF 7-14mm f/2.8-3.5L Fisheye STM if you want a brighter f/2.8 (1.0 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds; a wider view (from 7mm equivalent); and a lighter lens (476 g against 570 g).
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon RF 10-20mm f/4L IS STM | Canon RF 7-14mm f/2.8-3.5L Fisheye STM |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Canon |
| Focal length | 10-20mm (zoom) | 7-14mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 10-20mm | 7-14mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/4 | f/2.8-3.5brighter |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Mounts | Canon RF | Canon RF |
| Stabilised | yesstabilised | no |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 2.0× | 2.0× |
| Weight | 570 g | 476 glighter |
| Cameras it fits | 18 in this guide | 18 in this guide |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
18 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body.
Canon RF 10-20mm f/4L IS STM
- Canon EOS R6 V
- Canon EOS R8 Mark II
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Canon EOS R50 V
- Canon EOS R1
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II
- Canon EOS R8
- Canon EOS R100
- Canon EOS R50
- Canon EOS R5 C