Compare cameras
Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Leica SL3
The Canon EOS R5 Mark II and the Leica SL3 side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Leica SL3 if you want more resolution, for cropping and big prints (60 against 45 MP) and more lenses made for it in this guide (158 against 99). On these specs the Canon EOS R5 Mark II has no clear advantage: choose it if the price, the handling or a lens you own decides it. If you already own Canon RF or L-Mount lenses, the camera on that mount saves you buying them again.
Still torn? Ask the guide about the Canon EOS R5 Mark II and the Leica SL3
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon EOS R5 Mark II | Leica SL3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Leica |
| Mount | Canon RF | L-Mount |
| Sensor | Full frame, 36 x 24 mm | Full frame, 36 x 24 mm |
| Crop factor | 1× | 1× |
| Resolution | 45 MP | 60 MPmore detail |
| Stabilisation | in the body | in the body |
| Announced | 2024 | 2024 |
| Type | mirrorless camera | mirrorless camera |
| Weight | 746 g | 769 g |
| Lenses in this guide | 99 for its sensor, 45 more with a crop | 158 for its sensor, 27 more with a cropmore lenses |
Sensor size
Crop factors: Canon EOS R5 Mark II 1×, Leica SL3 1×.
What a 50mm frames like
Both have the same sensor size, so a 50mm lens frames the same on each: like 50mm on full frame.
Lenses
Different mounts (Canon RF and L-Mount): a lens for one does not fit the other without an adapter. 33 lens designs in this guide are made in both mounts, mostly from third-party makers.
The Canon EOS R5 Mark II: 99 Canon RF lenses in this guide cover its sensor. The Leica SL3: 158 L-Mount lenses in this guide cover its sensor.