Compare lenses
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM vs Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III
The Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM and the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM if you want optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it. On these specs the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III has no clear advantage: choose it if the price, the handling or a lens you own decides it.
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM | Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Canon |
| Focal length | 70-300mm (zoom) | 75-300mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 70-300mm | 75-300mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/4-5.6 |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Mounts | Canon EF | Canon EF |
| Stabilised | yesstabilised | no |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 4.3× | 4.0× |
| Cameras it fits | 22 in this guide | 22 in this guide |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
22 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body.
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM
- Canon EOS-1D X Mark III
- Canon EOS 850D
- Canon EOS 250D
- Canon EOS 90D
- Canon EOS 2000D
- Canon EOS 4000D
- Canon EOS 6D Mark II
- Canon EOS 200D
- Canon EOS 77D
- Canon EOS 800D