Compare lenses
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM vs Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Art
The Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM and the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Art side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Art if you want optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it and a fit on more cameras (39 against 22 in this guide). On these specs the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM has no clear advantage: choose it if the price, the handling or a lens you own decides it.
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM | Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Art |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Sigma |
| Focal length | 24-70mm (zoom) | 24-70mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 24-70mm | 24-70mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Mounts | Canon EF | Canon EF, Nikon F |
| Stabilised | no | yesstabilised |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 2.9× | 2.9× |
| Cameras it fits | 22 in this guide | 39 in this guidefits more cameras |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
22 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM fits 22 and the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Art 39.
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
- Canon EOS-1D X Mark III
- Canon EOS 850D
- Canon EOS 250D
- Canon EOS 90D
- Canon EOS 2000D
- Canon EOS 4000D
- Canon EOS 6D Mark II
- Canon EOS 200D
- Canon EOS 77D
- Canon EOS 800D