Compare lenses
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM vs Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM
The Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM and the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM if you want coverage of full frame, so it suits the larger-sensor bodies too and a fit on more cameras (22 against 14 in this guide). Pick the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM if you want optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it; more reach (to 82mm equivalent); and a design for APS-C, which usually means smaller and lighter.
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Canon |
| Focal length | 24-70mm (zoom) | 17-55mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 24-70mm | 26-82mm on APS-C |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Made for | Full frame | APS-C |
| Mounts | Canon EF | Canon EF |
| Stabilised | no | yesstabilised |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 2.9× | 3.2× |
| Weight | 805 g | not listed |
| Cameras it fits | 22 in this guidefits more cameras | 14 in this guide |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
14 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM fits 22 and the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM 14.
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM
- Canon EOS-1D X Mark III
- Canon EOS 850D
- Canon EOS 250D
- Canon EOS 90D
- Canon EOS 2000D
- Canon EOS 4000D
- Canon EOS 6D Mark II
- Canon EOS 200D
- Canon EOS 77D
- Canon EOS 800D