Compare lenses
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM vs Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM
The Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM and the Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM if you want a brighter f/4 (0.3 stops more light), for dim light and softer backgrounds; more reach (to 35mm equivalent); coverage of full frame, so it suits the larger-sensor bodies too; and a fit on more cameras (22 against 14 in this guide). Pick the Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM if you want a design for APS-C, which usually means smaller and lighter.
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Canon |
| Focal length | 16-35mm (zoom) | 10-18mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 16-35mm | 15-27mm on APS-C |
| Maximum aperture | f/4brighter | f/4.5-5.6 |
| Made for | Full frame | APS-C |
| Mounts | Canon EF | Canon EF |
| Stabilised | yes | yes |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 2.2×more range | 1.8× |
| Weight | 615 g | not listed |
| Cameras it fits | 22 in this guidefits more cameras | 14 in this guide |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
14 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body. In all, the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM fits 22 and the Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM 14.
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM
- Canon EOS-1D X Mark III
- Canon EOS 850D
- Canon EOS 250D
- Canon EOS 90D
- Canon EOS 2000D
- Canon EOS 4000D
- Canon EOS 6D Mark II
- Canon EOS 200D
- Canon EOS 77D
- Canon EOS 800D