Compare lenses
Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM vs Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM
The Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM and the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM side by side, computed from this guide's catalogue.
Which to pick
Pick the Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM if you want a wider view (from 11mm equivalent). Pick the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM if you want optical stabilisation, which helps most on bodies without it and more reach (to 35mm equivalent).
Still torn? Ask the guide about the Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM and the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM
Specs side by side
| Spec | Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Canon | Canon |
| Focal length | 11-24mm (zoom) | 16-35mm (zoom) |
| Full-frame equivalent | 11-24mm | 16-35mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/4 | f/4 |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Mounts | Canon EF | Canon EF |
| Stabilised | no | yesstabilised |
| Autofocus | yes | yes |
| Zoom range | 2.2× | 2.2× |
| Weight | not listed | 615 g |
| Cameras it fits | 22 in this guide | 22 in this guide |
Focal range, in full-frame terms
Aperture
Each opening drawn to scale against f/1.4: a smaller f-number lets in more light and blurs the background more.
Field of view
Cameras they fit
22 cameras in this guide take both, so either works on the same body.
Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM
- Canon EOS-1D X Mark III
- Canon EOS 850D
- Canon EOS 250D
- Canon EOS 90D
- Canon EOS 2000D
- Canon EOS 4000D
- Canon EOS 6D Mark II
- Canon EOS 200D
- Canon EOS 77D
- Canon EOS 800D