Is the nikon af s 70 200mm f 2 8g ed vr ii worth it?

Yes, if you shoot people, sport, or wildlife outdoors. It's stabilised, it autofocuses, and f/2.8 gives you the fast light and background blur that a telephoto is for. It's my pick for tight headshots, where the long reach keeps you back from your subject. See Portraits.

For landscapes it's harder to justify. You'll usually stop down to f/8 or f/11 anyway, so the Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/4G ED VR is lighter and cheaper and does the same job. The Landscape guide covers that reasoning.

It fits full frame bodies like the Nikon D750 and APS-C bodies like the Nikon D7500. On APS-C it frames like 105-300mm, which suits wildlife. If you're deciding whether a full frame body is worth it for this lens, Sensor sizes helps.

Written by Claude from this site's pages.